Results 41 to 50 of 50
-
09-06-2020, 04:03 PM #41
-
Twhitenosugar Thanked / Liked this Post
-
09-06-2020, 06:52 PM #42
I’m about to make mine so will use less holes and see what occurs
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Stuffyrat Thanked / Liked this Post
-
09-06-2020, 08:17 PM #43
-
Twhitenosugar Thanked / Liked this Post
-
09-06-2020, 08:28 PM #44
It works well doesn’t it?
I only held mine over the outlet for 5 minutes at it picked up loads of junk.
Also I’ve turned my pumps down and my air down, hasn’t made a blind bit of difference to my water parameters but less suspended junk which is nice.
Still have plenty of flow round the pond via the airlift though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Stuffyrat Thanked / Liked this Post
-
09-06-2020, 08:36 PM #45
-
09-06-2020, 10:59 PM #46
If we don’t move house then next years project will be to convert to airlift.
Don’t think it’ll be a massive job using 2Sugars external tank method.
If we do move then the next pond will be airlifts from the start.
Not having the courage of my convictions to begin with was (another) mistake lol.
I’d certainly encourage anyone considering building a pond now to at least consider them as the energy saving alone would be considerable.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Twhitenosugar Thanked / Liked this Post
-
05-08-2020, 07:12 AM #47
I came across this interesting piece - submergence and also sizing of air pumps:
B2.jpg
Source: https://www.plantservices.com/articles/2002/12/
Improving airlift performance
There's also an interesting paper on the use of vortices on improving airlift performance: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/...=honors_theses this uses a back flow through the air injection nozzle at 45 degrees to make the airlift water rotate - including the air.
So by having an combined water + air injection at the bottom at 45 degrees the vortex created helps improve performance. Now they are using gallons per minute flow rates, so it would be interesting to see how much of an improvement it would make for a lower flow rate.1700 litres on 50 watts
Planned 11,777 litres on 58 watts. 1300l anoxic, 4" airlifts, Solum 16, bio.
-
06-08-2020, 02:46 PM #48
Thanks for the info Nick. Although the conclusions of the paper on making a vortex/ swirl of injected water suggests that it made little improvement to flow in most configurations.
Although others reading this may not want to go into that much detail, it does show that airlifts are backed up by science, and not just a bunch of people on a forum who claim they work.
I must admit the main reason why i was initially hesitant about using air lifts, rather than a conventional pump, was in case it didn't work, as it seems to good to be true.
But built in the right way, boy do they work.
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk13,000L fibreglassed raised pond with window
-
06-08-2020, 03:24 PM #49
Oh yes - there's a massive amount of academic research into airlifts as they are used extensively in industries such as agriculture etc. I was looking at the efficiency of using slugs (bubbles the width of the pipe) rather than a small bubble flow at the side.
I worked out the lpm air for my 1.75m submerged airlift for 10,000lgh flow rate = 48.69 lpm of air according to the diagram..
However I'm concerned that it doesn't take into account pipe diameter..1700 litres on 50 watts
Planned 11,777 litres on 58 watts. 1300l anoxic, 4" airlifts, Solum 16, bio.
-
01-03-2021, 08:35 PM #50
Thank You! For the read up, I will have a go at building one later in the Year!
-
Twhitenosugar Thanked / Liked this Post
Blanket weed treatment
UV light on or off, doesn't say anything in instructions [emoji848] Thanks Sent from my moto e6...